CM
COMPASS MINERALS INTERNATIONAL INC (CMP)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered a broad-based beat: revenue $494.6M vs consensus ~$414.0M, and adjusted EPS $0.63 vs consensus ~$0.00; EBITDA modestly ahead on S&P’s definition; guidance was raised at the total-company level, led by Salt volumes and revenue strength *.
- Inventory rationalization unlocked cash: ~$150M working capital release and ~$170M (18%) sequential net debt reduction; liquidity ended at $328.6M (cash $49.5M, revolver availability $279.1M) .
- Salt volumes surged on stronger winter weather; margin per ton compressed temporarily due to 2024 curtailment effects and lower average highway pricing (-5% YoY), but management expects per-ton economics to improve as production normalizes .
- Corporate cost actions and Fortress wind-down progressed; total FY25 adjusted EBITDA guidance raised to $173–$202M (midpoint +$15M vs Q1), with Corporate adjusted EBITDA improved to -$59 to -$52M and Salt revenue lifted to $975–$1,050M .
- Near-term stock narrative catalysts: constructive 2025/2026 bid season setup (low system inventories, improving pricing psychology), deleveraging trajectory, and clearer tariff backdrop (USMCA exemption for Canadian production) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Working capital and deleveraging: “We realized a working capital release of nearly $150 million… reducing net total debt by approximately $170 million or 18% in the quarter.” — CEO Edward Dowling .
- Salt volume strength: Highway deicing volumes +51% YoY; total Salt revenue +39% YoY to $432.7M as winter weather strengthened .
- Guidance raised and tariff clarity: FY25 total adjusted EBITDA to $173–$202M; USMCA qualification exempts Canadian exports from tariffs currently .
-
What Went Wrong
- Margin compression: Adjusted EBITDA/ton -30% YoY to ~$16.75 due to prior production curtailment (higher cost inventory sell-through) and -5% highway pricing YoY .
- Fortress-related non-cash charges: $53.0M impairment in Q2; comparability impacted across periods; adjusted EBITDA also affected by contingent consideration remeasurement .
- Plant Nutrition profitability: Adjusted EBITDA declined to $5.6M (vs $7.3M prior year) on lower pricing (-8% YoY) and higher distribution costs per ton (+13% YoY) .
Financial Results
Segment breakdown
KPIs and balance sheet
Estimate comparison (S&P Global consensus vs actuals)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Compass Minerals continues to make progress on its back-to-basics strategy... optimization... to become a more efficient and profitable organization.” — CEO Edward Dowling .
- “We realized a working capital release of nearly $150 million... reducing net total debt by approximately $170 million or 18% in the quarter.” — Edward Dowling .
- “From a pricing perspective, the setup is constructive as we enter North American bid season... not unreasonable to think the pendulum can sweep back in our favor.” — Edward Dowling .
- “At the midpoint, we are now showing $188 million [FY25 adjusted EBITDA]... Even adjusting for [~$8M contingent consideration gain], we’re showing improvements in guidance for Salt and Corporate.” — CFO Peter Fjellman .
- Plant Nutrition: “Engineering work [for the dryer/compaction plant] is well advanced... we believe that we will be able to materially reduce the cost of our SOP production.” — Edward Dowling .
Q&A Highlights
- AR balances: CFO noted insurance settlement items gross up AR/AP; expects AR to trend down with sell-through normalization .
- Bid season indicators: Early tender sizes range “slightly up to significantly up” in some regions; setup positive for volumes/pricing, varying by locale .
- Plant Nutrition margin path: Multi-year effort — restore pond chemistry and execute dryer/compaction plant project; incremental operational improvements underway .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 results substantially beat consensus on revenue and EPS; EBITDA slightly above S&P’s definition. Company-reported Adjusted EBITDA is higher due to adjustments (e.g., impairments), while S&P consensus/actual may use a different EBITDA basis *.
- With stronger winter-driven volumes and a constructive bid environment, Street models likely need to reflect higher Salt volumes/revenue and less negative Corporate spend; Plant Nutrition maintained guidance, but execution improvements could support future estimate revisions . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Salt demand normalizing with tight system inventories; expect improved pricing/commitments into 2025/2026 bid season — constructive for revenue trajectory .
- Deleveraging is happening fast; WC release and capex discipline ($75–$85M) support ongoing net debt reduction and improved balance sheet flexibility .
- Margin optics should improve as high-cost 2024 inventory rolls off and production ramps; watch adjusted EBITDA/ton recovery in Salt .
- Corporate cost reset and Fortress wind-down reduce P&L drag; FY25 Corporate adjusted EBITDA less negative at -$59 to -$52M .
- Tariff risk de-escalated via USMCA exemption for Canadian production; reduces macro uncertainty for U.S. imports .
- Plant Nutrition execution (pond restoration, plant upgrades) is a medium-term margin lever; pricing remains pressured by global potash dynamics near term .
- Near-term trading lens: emphasize the beat, raised guidance, and deleveraging narrative; monitor bid season outcomes and any pricing updates as catalysts .
Bolded estimate beats/misses:
- Q2 Revenue: $494.6M vs ~$414.0M consensus — Beat *.
- Q2 Primary EPS: $0.63 vs ~$0.00 consensus — Beat *.
- Q2 EBITDA (S&P): ~$72.5M vs ~$70.2M consensus — Beat (modest) *.
Notes: Company Adjusted EBITDA in Q2 was $84.1M; comparability impacted by Fortress contingent consideration remeasurement (company provided a modified figure of $76.2M for clarity) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.